<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=3589" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC Diffusional Kurtosis Estimator Forum: dke-questions</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=3589</link>
  <description>Any Problems Post-Processing? </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 4:02:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
  <item>
   <title>Mouse datasets</title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=16076&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Hello, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I am trying to process preclinical diffusion data using the DKE and would appreciate some advice.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I am working with in vivo mouse brain data acquired on a 7T Bruker BioSpec (70/30) scanner running ParaVision360 3.6, using a standard DWI EPI sequence.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I have tried importing both converted NIfTI files and raw DICOMs into DKE, but I am running into significant issues with the output maps. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Initially, the default spatial smoothing settings were clearly tailored for human data and were far too strong for the small mouse brain. However, even after reducing the filter, the resulting kurtosis maps remain quite &amp;quot;holey&amp;quot;, with zero-value voxels or empty regions throughout the brain tissue.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I am wondering if DKE is actually suitable for small animal data or if it is strictly optimized for human datasets.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Additionally, I would like to know if there are specific pre-processing requirements or data formatting steps for Bruker/ParaVision data that I might be missing, and if anyone can share recommended parameter settings for mouse data.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Any advice on settings, data import would be greatly appreciated.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thanks in advance!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dominika Valaskova&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;</description>
   <author>Dominika Valášková</author>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 8:21:25 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=16076&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>RE: Strage pxel blocks on fitting Kmeans maps and parts of the image are missing</title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>[i]Originally posted by Emilie McKinnon:[/i][quote]Hi! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out the masking feature. By default, DKE uses a threshold value of 50 in the B-0 value to create a brain mask. Just by glancing at your image it looks like this is animal data and so your threshold might have to be adjusted?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just so you know, we are phasing out support for DKE and have moved to a more modern software that will be monitored more closely. The documentation can be found here: https://pydesigner.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I apologize for the delay!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best,&lt;br /&gt;
Emilie[/quote]&lt;br /&gt;
[color=#000000]Thank you for your reply! [/color]I have tried the directional fitting instead of tensor fitting and I found these pixels disappear and the fitting results became coherent. So what's the difference between these two fitting methods? If I acquired data in &amp;gt;15 directions, which methods could be more accurate? By the way, is there any requirements on adjusting the B-0 threshold?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best,&lt;br /&gt;
Ruicheng</description>
   <author>ruicheng ba</author>
   <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 8:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>RE: Strage pxel blocks on fitting Kmeans maps and parts of the image are missing</title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>Thank you for your reply!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tried the directional fitting instead of tensor fitting and I found these pixels disappear and the fitting results became coherent. So what's the difference between these two fitting methods? If I acquired data in &amp;gt;15 directions, which methods could be more accurate? By the way, is there any requirements on adjusting the B-0 threshold?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best,&lt;br /&gt;
Ruicheng</description>
   <author>ruicheng ba</author>
   <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 8:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>RE: Strage pxel blocks on fitting Kmeans maps and parts of the image are missing</title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>Hi! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out the masking feature. By default, DKE uses a threshold value of 50 in the B-0 value to create a brain mask. Just by glancing at your image it looks like this is animal data and so your threshold might have to be adjusted?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just so you know, we are phasing out support for DKE and have moved to a more modern software that will be monitored more closely. The documentation can be found here: https://pydesigner.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I apologize for the delay!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best,&lt;br /&gt;
Emilie</description>
   <author>Emilie McKinnon</author>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:56:18 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>RE: Fail in installation of DKE</title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13320&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>Hi Liu, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Couple of questions: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- What operating system are you using? &lt;br /&gt;
- Did you try running DKE using the command line?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, just so you know we are phasing out support for DKE and have moved to a different processing software that will be more active. I will post the link here for your convenience: https://pydesigner.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best, &lt;br /&gt;
Emilie</description>
   <author>Emilie McKinnon</author>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13320&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Fail in installation of DKE</title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13320&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>I installed  MCR （R2012a (7.17) 64-bit），but I can't run DKE. Using DKEGUI.exe, I get message:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[b]idx_gradients{1} = [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18];[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
[b]idx_gradients{2} = [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18];[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
[b]idx_gradients{3} = [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18];[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[b]command line: dke DKEParameters.dat[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
[b]An Error has occurred while trying to initialize the MCR.[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
[b]The error is: Fatal error loading library C:\WINDOWS\system\libmx.dll Error: The specified module could not be found[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
[b]Error:mclmcr initialization failed[/b]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know if I installed MCR correctly. When I installed MCR, I just selected installation path,should I select a specific path? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to set environment variables,but it still didn't work(message above).I really need help.</description>
   <author>Liu Kuiyuan</author>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 9:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13320&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Strage pxel blocks on fitting Kmeans maps and parts of the image are missing</title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>I input dwi images with b=0,0.8,1.5 and 2.5, where b0 has one direction and the other b values have 18 directions. There are discontinuous squares on the Kmean maps of the output result. May I ask why this is caused? I checked the original image, and there were no artifacts of similar shapes. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition, I found that part of images on Kmean Map were missing. I attached the comparison images. Attachment 1 is the Kmean map, and Attachment 2 is the B0 image of the input data.</description>
   <author>ruicheng ba</author>
   <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=13129&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>RE: Apply DKI model to multi-shell acquisition? </title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=12812&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>Thank you very much, Kayti!</description>
   <author>Cristina Roman</author>
   <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=12812&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>RE: Apply DKI model to multi-shell acquisition? </title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=12812&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>Hi Cristina,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The parameters you supplied are sufficient for DKI and DKE should work just fine with your dataset. However, DKE is now a legacy software that is no longer supported. Our lab has transitioned to a similar tool called PyDesigner, which we encourage all DKE users to consider using as well. It is a hands-off Python-based implementation of [url=https://github.com/NYU-DiffusionMRI/DESIGNER]NYU's DESIGNER[/url] dMRI preprocessing pipeline designed to maximize signal-to-noise ratio. You can read about it further on [url=https://github.com/m-ama/PyDesigner]the PyDesigner Github page here[/url] and in [url=https://pydesigner.readthedocs.io/en/latest/]the PyDesigner documentation here[/url].</description>
   <author>Kayti Thorn</author>
   <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=12812&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Apply DKI model to multi-shell acquisition? </title>
   <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=12812&amp;forum_id=3589</link>
   <description>Hello, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a multishell diffusion protocol (see parameters below) and was curious if I can apply a DKI model to the data through DKE to obtain DKI metrics? Or, are the below parameters insufficient for DKI? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you in advance for your help!&lt;br /&gt;
Cristina&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3T Siemens Prisma Scanner, 64-channel head coil&lt;br /&gt;
Multiband factor of 3, no GRAPPA, bipolar acquisition&lt;br /&gt;
Diffusion directions calculated using INRIA (Caruyer et al., 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
Six separate scans&lt;br /&gt;
12 directions, 2 B0s (A&amp;gt;&amp;gt;P), b= 500 s/mm2&lt;br /&gt;
12 directions, 2 B0s (P&amp;gt;&amp;gt;A), b= 500 s/mm2&lt;br /&gt;
29 directions, 3 B0s (A&amp;gt;&amp;gt;P), b=1500 s/mm2&lt;br /&gt;
29 directions, 3 B0s (P&amp;gt;&amp;gt;A), b=1500 s/mm2&lt;br /&gt;
64 directions, 4 B0s (A&amp;gt;&amp;gt;P), b=3000 s/mm2&lt;br /&gt;
64 directions, 4 B0s (A&amp;gt;&amp;gt;P), b=3000 s/mm2&lt;br /&gt;
Data was concatenated and run through topup and eddy</description>
   <author>Cristina Roman</author>
   <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 18:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
   <guid>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=12812&amp;forum_id=3589</guid>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
