help > content of h-column in ROI.mat file?
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts
Feb 14, 2017 12:02 AM | Joyce Vromen
content of h-column in ROI.mat file?
Dear Sir/Madam,
Could you please tell me what measure of correlation the 'h' column in the ROI.mat file contains exactly (second-level ROI-to-ROi analyses, GLM correlation option)?
Also, does anyone have any advice on the following:
I have 4 conditions: 1) A_0, 2) A_200, 3) B_0, 4) B_200 and I want to create a contrast of two contrasts: (A > B) > (200 > 0). I have run the contrasts A > B and 200 > 0 in conn. However, it seems not possible to create a contrast of these two contrasts within conn. Therefore, I plan to subtract the values saved in the ROI.mat file for each of the two conducted contrasts to achieve this. I see two options there: 1) directly subtracting t-values (F column) or 2) subtracting correlation coefficients (? h column) and run the resulting values through an external NBS.
Do you see any problems with simply subtracting the t-values (the less labour intensive option)? Logically, would you expect any difference in result between the two options?
Thanks very much for your help.
Best wishes,
Joyce Vromen
Could you please tell me what measure of correlation the 'h' column in the ROI.mat file contains exactly (second-level ROI-to-ROi analyses, GLM correlation option)?
Also, does anyone have any advice on the following:
I have 4 conditions: 1) A_0, 2) A_200, 3) B_0, 4) B_200 and I want to create a contrast of two contrasts: (A > B) > (200 > 0). I have run the contrasts A > B and 200 > 0 in conn. However, it seems not possible to create a contrast of these two contrasts within conn. Therefore, I plan to subtract the values saved in the ROI.mat file for each of the two conducted contrasts to achieve this. I see two options there: 1) directly subtracting t-values (F column) or 2) subtracting correlation coefficients (? h column) and run the resulting values through an external NBS.
Do you see any problems with simply subtracting the t-values (the less labour intensive option)? Logically, would you expect any difference in result between the two options?
Thanks very much for your help.
Best wishes,
Joyce Vromen