Great, thanks, the new version works as you described.

A lot of subjects have their "TOTAL Confounds" explaining most of the variance, as in the screen shot attached to that previous post. Does that look normal to you? The Total doesn't seem to be a combination of the individual confounds, and it is certainly a lot of the variance (e.g., for some subjects the Total confounds explain >0.9 variance for the whole brain).

Best,
Brad