open-discussion
open-discussion > Correlation in Shape_analysis_mancova_wizard
Dec 16, 2014 04:12 PM | Olof Lindberg
Correlation in Shape_analysis_mancova_wizard
Dear Beatriz,
thanks for your answers!
Just one thing: Do i HAVE TO demean variables when running correlations. I would normally not do this as I would think that, no matter the scale, the correlation analysis would reveal the same results.
The reason that I ask this is that I managed to get a bit strange results running one correlation analysis (see attached image) and I cannot understand what happened.
When running the same analysis but using Spearmans rather than Pearson correlation results seemed more like an result that I would expect from a shape analysis.
Any suggestions on what happened?
Thanks
Olof
thanks for your answers!
Just one thing: Do i HAVE TO demean variables when running correlations. I would normally not do this as I would think that, no matter the scale, the correlation analysis would reveal the same results.
The reason that I ask this is that I managed to get a bit strange results running one correlation analysis (see attached image) and I cannot understand what happened.
When running the same analysis but using Spearmans rather than Pearson correlation results seemed more like an result that I would expect from a shape analysis.
Any suggestions on what happened?
Thanks
Olof
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Chao Suo | Dec 8, 2014 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Dec 11, 2014 | |
Olof Lindberg | Feb 6, 2015 | |
Martin Styner | Feb 6, 2015 | |
Chao Suo | Dec 17, 2014 | |
Martin Styner | Dec 17, 2014 | |
Chao Suo | Dec 18, 2014 | |
Martin Styner | Dec 18, 2014 | |
Chao Suo | Jan 8, 2015 | |
Martin Styner | Jan 8, 2015 | |
Chao Suo | Jan 9, 2015 | |
Martin Styner | Jan 9, 2015 | |
Martin Styner | Dec 18, 2014 | |
Olof Lindberg | Dec 11, 2014 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Dec 16, 2014 | |
Olof Lindberg | Dec 16, 2014 | |
Martin Styner | Dec 16, 2014 | |