open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: running interaction with shapeAnalysisMANCOVA
Nov 17, 2015 11:11 PM | Lara Foland-Ross - Stanford University
RE: running interaction with shapeAnalysisMANCOVA
Hi Martin and Beatriz,
Thank you very much for the clear and helpful feedback. Everything is coming along smoothly!
I am now visualizing group differences in shape alterations (magnitude of differences) in ShapePopulationViewer. I see in your 2009 Insight Journal publication (http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/pu...) that the difference maps show negative values if group A has shrinkage relative to group B, and positive values if group A has expansion relative to group B.
My question is: how can I confirm which group is group A in my study, and which is group B?
I see that, in the terminal in which I'm running shapeAnalysisMANCOVA, there is a printout that reads:
"data in group_type 0 has been relabeled: 1 --> group A = -1 ; 0 --> group B = 1
#(A)= 142; #(B)= 64
data in group_type 1 has been relabeled: 0 --> group A = -1 ; 1 --> group B = 1
#(A)= 250; #(B)= 162"
...which offers some hints. But given my analysis setup, I'm a bit confused as to what this means. Recall that my inputfile.csv file has the following headers:
diagnosis,sex,diagnosis_sex_interaction,Scaling,File,tbv,tbv_dm,age,age_dm
...To inspect a main effect of sex, controlling for tbv_dm and age_dm, with sex, diagnosis and the interaction of sex and diagnosis in the model, my shape command is as follows:
shapeAnalysisMANCOVA inputfile.csv --infileColumn 4 --numGroupTypes 2 --numIndependent 2 --columnGroupTypes 0,1,2 --columnIndependent 6,8 --testColumn 1
From the printout in the terminal, I'm inferring that re: "diagnosis", group A = individuals with a "1" in the diagnosis column, and group B = individuals with a "0" in the diagnosis column. But what about sex? Is there a way I can tell whether individuals with a "1" in the sex column are in group A or group B? Likewise for the "diagnosis_sex_interaction" column.
Many thanks for the continued help!
Lara
Thank you very much for the clear and helpful feedback. Everything is coming along smoothly!
I am now visualizing group differences in shape alterations (magnitude of differences) in ShapePopulationViewer. I see in your 2009 Insight Journal publication (http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/pu...) that the difference maps show negative values if group A has shrinkage relative to group B, and positive values if group A has expansion relative to group B.
My question is: how can I confirm which group is group A in my study, and which is group B?
I see that, in the terminal in which I'm running shapeAnalysisMANCOVA, there is a printout that reads:
"data in group_type 0 has been relabeled: 1 --> group A = -1 ; 0 --> group B = 1
#(A)= 142; #(B)= 64
data in group_type 1 has been relabeled: 0 --> group A = -1 ; 1 --> group B = 1
#(A)= 250; #(B)= 162"
...which offers some hints. But given my analysis setup, I'm a bit confused as to what this means. Recall that my inputfile.csv file has the following headers:
diagnosis,sex,diagnosis_sex_interaction,Scaling,File,tbv,tbv_dm,age,age_dm
...To inspect a main effect of sex, controlling for tbv_dm and age_dm, with sex, diagnosis and the interaction of sex and diagnosis in the model, my shape command is as follows:
shapeAnalysisMANCOVA inputfile.csv --infileColumn 4 --numGroupTypes 2 --numIndependent 2 --columnGroupTypes 0,1,2 --columnIndependent 6,8 --testColumn 1
From the printout in the terminal, I'm inferring that re: "diagnosis", group A = individuals with a "1" in the diagnosis column, and group B = individuals with a "0" in the diagnosis column. But what about sex? Is there a way I can tell whether individuals with a "1" in the sex column are in group A or group B? Likewise for the "diagnosis_sex_interaction" column.
Many thanks for the continued help!
Lara
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 4, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 6, 2015 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Nov 9, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 9, 2015 | |
D J | Nov 10, 2015 | |
Martin Styner | Nov 10, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 10, 2015 | |
Martin Styner | Nov 11, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 11, 2015 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Nov 12, 2015 | |
Martin Styner | Nov 12, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 17, 2015 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Nov 18, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 18, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 23, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 30, 2015 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Nov 30, 2015 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Dec 1, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Dec 2, 2015 | |
Beatriz Paniagua | Dec 8, 2015 | |
Lara Foland-Ross | Nov 9, 2015 | |
D J | Nov 9, 2015 | |