help
help > RE: connectivity in CSF
Jan 12, 2017 02:01 PM | Elsa Ermer - University of Maryland Baltimore
RE: connectivity in CSF
Hi Alfonso,
Thanks for your reply and suggestions. I have gone through all my subjects and checked their normalization, coregistration, WM and CSF masks, and it all looks fine. The WM and CSF are also included as confounds in the denoising tab with 5 dimensions.
However, at least for some subjects, it does not look like spurious correlations or in subcortical areas. In the attached example, there is large groups of voxels (at threshold .25) in CSF and lesion area. Looking at the GM, WM, and CSF ROIs, it looks like these are all being correctly identified. So I thought the CSF/WM should be masked out of the analysis, or am I misunderstanding something?
Thanks,
Elsa
Thanks for your reply and suggestions. I have gone through all my subjects and checked their normalization, coregistration, WM and CSF masks, and it all looks fine. The WM and CSF are also included as confounds in the denoising tab with 5 dimensions.
However, at least for some subjects, it does not look like spurious correlations or in subcortical areas. In the attached example, there is large groups of voxels (at threshold .25) in CSF and lesion area. Looking at the GM, WM, and CSF ROIs, it looks like these are all being correctly identified. So I thought the CSF/WM should be masked out of the analysis, or am I misunderstanding something?
Thanks,
Elsa
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Elsa Ermer | Dec 6, 2016 | |
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 6, 2016 | |
Elsa Ermer | Jan 12, 2017 | |