open-discussion > RE: Problem with SPHARM-PDM on new dataset!
Jan 17, 2017  03:01 PM | Martin Styner
RE: Problem with SPHARM-PDM on new dataset!
Hi Nazanin
Re 1) Yes, you can do that, though you need to double check for bad flips and very likely need to flip a few cases manually via ParaToSPHARMMeshCLP. Use ShapePopulationViewer with the phi and theta coloring to check for flips. Use it also to check for appropriate correspondence without the additional parameter space alignment). 

You though still need the procrustes alignment, as the pre-alignment is usually not good enough and you don't want any translational and rotational effects in your shape analysis.

Re 2) No, we did not use landmarking, but rather the approach that you are suggesting in (1). If I remember correctly, we added that option specifically for that paper. It's less optional compared to the landmark solution, but appropriate.

Martin

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Nazanin M Sep 27, 2016
Nazanin M Nov 4, 2016
Martin Styner Nov 10, 2016
Nazanin M Dec 26, 2016
Martin Styner Jan 2, 2017
Nazanin M Jan 2, 2017
Martin Styner Jan 5, 2017
Nazanin M Jan 11, 2017
RE: Problem with SPHARM-PDM on new dataset!
Martin Styner Jan 17, 2017
Nazanin M Jan 17, 2017
Nazanin M Jan 17, 2017
Nazanin M Nov 2, 2016
Martin Styner Nov 4, 2016
Antoine Bouyeure Oct 30, 2016
Martin Styner Oct 31, 2016
D J Nov 1, 2016
Antoine Bouyeure Nov 1, 2016
Martin Styner Nov 1, 2016
Antoine Bouyeure Oct 29, 2016
Nazanin M Oct 30, 2016
Martin Styner Oct 31, 2016