help > RE: Graph Theory correlation measures
Aug 3, 2012 12:08 PM | RE: Graph Theory correlation measures Thanks for the reply Alfonso. It does clarify. I have one quick followup question. When I run a between subjects contrast with a 0 for All and 1 for a behaviour measure, the graph theory explorer displays the results of this contrast. However, when I export the data, it looks like it is exporting the raw graph measures for each ROI/subject. Is there a way to export the results of the contrasts instead (i.e. global efficiency values for each subject that is unique to the behaviour measure), or would this need to be calculated outside of conn? Originally posted by Alfonso Nieto-Castanon: Hi
Aiden,
The adjacency matrix is always defined by thresholding the original ROI-to-ROI correlation coefficient matrix, but the details of this thresholding operation vary depending on the choices in the 'Network edges (adjacency matrix threshold)' options in the 'graph theory results explorer' gui. If you choose 'correlation coefficient' there, then the adjacency matrix is formed by selecting the edges with correlation coefficient values above the threshold value that you choose (e.g. if you choose a value of 0.5 then two ROIs are connected if their bivariate correlation is above 0.5). If you use 'z-score' then the correlation-coefficient values are first transformed to z-scores (i.e. normalized to have zero mean and variance one, separately for each subject), and the adjacency matrix is formed by selecting the edges with z-scores above the chosen threshold value (e.g. if you choose a value of 1 then two ROIs are connected if their correlation coefficients are one standard deviation above the mean -for a given subject). Last, if you choose 'cost' (the default setting), then the adjacency matrix is formed by selecting a fixed percentile (the chosen threshold value) of the edges in each network (those with the largest correlation coefficient values, separately for each subject). Note that this results in graphs for each subject that have the same 'cost' (e.g. if you choose a value of 0.15 then each subject graph will have a fixed cost of 0.15, meaning that 15% of all possible edges are present) Let me know if this clarifies Best Alfonso Originally posted by Aiden Arnold: Hi there,
I'm running an analysis through the graph theory explorer using a between subjects contrast of [0 1], where 0 is the group average and 1 is a behavioural measure. My question is: what is the correlation value from within each node being used to set up the association matrix? I set it up as a bivariate correlation in the first level analysis and am not sure if it is the average Pearson correlation coefficient from all voxels within that node, or if it's the Fisher transformed value. Thanks for your help! |
| Threaded View |
| Title | Author | Date |
| Graph Theory correlation measures | Aiden Arnold | Aug 1, 2012 |
| RE: Graph Theory correlation measures | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Aug 1, 2012 |
| RE: Graph Theory correlation measures | Aiden Arnold | Aug 3, 2012 |
| RE: Graph Theory correlation measures | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Aug 13, 2012 |








