[Camino-users] procstreamlines / waypoint question

[Michael]

Hi Torsten,

I believe that each waypoint ROI needs to have a different label (i.e.
intensity) for them to be differentiated. So you can fill your first
waypoint ROI with 1, your second waypoint ROI with 2, etc.


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Torsten Rohlfing <torstenrohlfing at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi Guys -
>
> I am wondering: from the "procstreamlines" documentation
>
> http://cmic.cs.ucl.ac.uk/**camino//index.php?n=Man.**Procstreamlines<http://cmic.cs.ucl.ac.uk/camino//index.php?n=Man.Procstreamlines>
>
> "All waypoints must be intersected but only two endpoint ROIs must be
> intersected. "
>
> it appears to me that if I give multiple waypointfiles to procstreamlines,
> then only those streamlines will be kept that intersect a non-zero pixel in
> EACH of the waypoint maps. But what I seem to be getting instead is all
> streamlines that intersect a non-zero pixel in ANY of the waypoint maps.
>
> Am I misreading things?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Torsten
>
> --
> Torsten Rohlfing, PhD          SRI International, Neuroscience Program
>  Program Director               333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025
>   Phone: ++1 (650) 859-3379      Fax: ++1 (650) 859-2743
>    torsten at synapse.sri.com        http://www.stanford.edu/~**rohlfing/<http://www.stanford.edu/~rohlfing/>
>
>      "Though this be madness, yet there is a method in't"
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Camino-users mailing list
> Camino-users at www.nitrc.org
> http://www.nitrc.org/mailman/**listinfo/camino-users<http://www.nitrc.org/mailman/listinfo/camino-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/camino-users/attachments/20131031/955caab8/attachment.html>