From amosteee at hotmail.com  Wed Dec 22 05:50:47 2021
From: amosteee at hotmail.com (Toluwani Amos)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:50:47 +0000
Subject: [Camino-users] Fwd: Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)
In-Reply-To: <TYCP286MB1931AB84842C7B61A5A6D7E2CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <TYCP286MB1931AB84842C7B61A5A6D7E2CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID: <TYCP286MB19313C3945BD63C1750FE580CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Toluwani Amos <amosteee at hotmail.com>
Date: December 22, 2021 at 4:15:39 PM GMT+8
To: camino-users at www.nitrc.org
Subject: Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)

?
Dear all,

I tried replicating the analysis steps using camino as stated in: Camino | Connectivity Matrices (ucl.ac.uk)<http://camino.cs.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?n=Tutorials.ConnectivityMatrices>

However, the final connectivity matrix looked different from the one I got. I used the same sample data and steps.

Please what do you think I might be missing.

Here are the attached images.
[cid:image003.png at 01D7F74F.35D1D4E0]
Thanks.
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/camino-users/attachments/20211222/b242b4cd/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: F96B2E0B8C2C451191753335EB858C1F.png
Type: image/png
Size: 180172 bytes
Desc: F96B2E0B8C2C451191753335EB858C1F.png
URL: <http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/camino-users/attachments/20211222/b242b4cd/attachment-0001.png>

From cookpa at pennmedicine.upenn.edu  Wed Dec 22 08:53:50 2021
From: cookpa at pennmedicine.upenn.edu (Cook, Philip)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:53:50 +0000
Subject: [Camino-users] Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)
In-Reply-To: <TYCP286MB19313C3945BD63C1750FE580CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <TYCP286MB1931AB84842C7B61A5A6D7E2CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <TYCP286MB19313C3945BD63C1750FE580CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID: <MN2PR04MB6830642CFFE8665D43730C7BE67D9@MN2PR04MB6830.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

There's two options for generating the streamlines, I can't recall which one was used to make the figure. The probabilistic tracking will vary run to run because of random sampling.

Also, it looks like your heatmap has different row ordering and color key. You can try adding Rowv=TRUE, Colv=TRUE, dendrogram = "none", to make them look more similar, but I'm sorry I don't know the exact command that was used.


From: Camino-users <camino-users-bounces at www.nitrc.org> on behalf of Toluwani Amos <amosteee at hotmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 5:50 AM
To: camino-users at www.nitrc.org <camino-users at www.nitrc.org>
Subject: [External] [Camino-users] Fwd: Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
From: Toluwani Amos <amosteee at hotmail.com>
Date: December 22, 2021 at 4:15:39 PM GMT+8
To: camino-users at www.nitrc.org
Subject: Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)
?
Dear all,

I tried replicating the analysis steps using camino as stated in: Camino | Connectivity Matrices (ucl.ac.uk)<http://camino.cs.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?n=Tutorials.ConnectivityMatrices>

However, the final connectivity matrix looked different from the one I got. I used the same sample data and steps.

Please what do you think I might be missing.

Here are the attached images.
[cid:image003.png at 01D7F74F.35D1D4E0]
Thanks.
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/camino-users/attachments/20211222/8321328f/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: F96B2E0B8C2C451191753335EB858C1F.png
Type: image/png
Size: 180178 bytes
Desc: F96B2E0B8C2C451191753335EB858C1F.png
URL: <http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/camino-users/attachments/20211222/8321328f/attachment-0001.png>

From amosteee at hotmail.com  Wed Dec 22 09:08:42 2021
From: amosteee at hotmail.com (Toluwani Amos)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:08:42 +0000
Subject: [Camino-users] Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR04MB6830642CFFE8665D43730C7BE67D9@MN2PR04MB6830.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <TYCP286MB1931AB84842C7B61A5A6D7E2CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <TYCP286MB19313C3945BD63C1750FE580CE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <MN2PR04MB6830642CFFE8665D43730C7BE67D9@MN2PR04MB6830.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <TYCP286MB1931863EBA94D8634849F76DCE7D9@TYCP286MB1931.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hello,

Thanks so much for your prompt response. I?ll adjust it accordingly.

Kind regards.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 22, 2021, at 9:53 PM, Cook, Philip <cookpa at pennmedicine.upenn.edu> wrote:

?
Hi,

There's two options for generating the streamlines, I can't recall which one was used to make the figure. The probabilistic tracking will vary run to run because of random sampling.

Also, it looks like your heatmap has different row ordering and color key. You can try adding Rowv=TRUE, Colv=TRUE, dendrogram = "none", to make them look more similar, but I'm sorry I don't know the exact command that was used.


From: Camino-users <camino-users-bounces at www.nitrc.org> on behalf of Toluwani Amos <amosteee at hotmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 5:50 AM
To: camino-users at www.nitrc.org <camino-users at www.nitrc.org>
Subject: [External] [Camino-users] Fwd: Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
From: Toluwani Amos <amosteee at hotmail.com>
Date: December 22, 2021 at 4:15:39 PM GMT+8
To: camino-users at www.nitrc.org
Subject: Replicating Sample Data (Minimum FA matrix)
?
Dear all,

I tried replicating the analysis steps using camino as stated in: Camino | Connectivity Matrices (ucl.ac.uk)<http://camino.cs.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?n=Tutorials.ConnectivityMatrices>

However, the final connectivity matrix looked different from the one I got. I used the same sample data and steps.

Please what do you think I might be missing.

Here are the attached images.
<F96B2E0B8C2C451191753335EB858C1F.png>
Thanks.
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/camino-users/attachments/20211222/7026966e/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: F96B2E0B8C2C451191753335EB858C1F.png
Type: image/png
Size: 180178 bytes
Desc: F96B2E0B8C2C451191753335EB858C1F.png
URL: <http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/camino-users/attachments/20211222/7026966e/attachment-0001.png>