<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=2415" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: optimizing-hippocampal-segmentation-in-infants-utilizing-mri-post-acquisition-processing</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=2415</link>
  <description>&lt;p class=&quot;abstract&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;Abstract&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;Abs1&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;AbstractHeading&quot;&gt;Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;normal&quot;&gt;This study aims to determine the most reliable method for infant hippocampal segmentation by comparing magnetic resonance
 (MR) imaging post-acquisition processing techniques: contrast to noise ratio (CNR) enhancement, or reformatting to standard
 orientation. MR scans were performed with a 1.5&amp;nbsp;T GE scanner to obtain dual echo T2 and proton density (PD) images at term
 equivalent (38–42&amp;nbsp;weeks’ gestational age). 15 hippocampi were manually traced four times on ten infant images by 2 independent
 raters on the original T2 image, as well as images processed by: a) combining T2 and PD images (T2-PD) to enhance CNR; then
 b) reformatting T2-PD images perpendicular to the long axis of the left hippocampus. CNRs and intraclass correlation coefficients
 (ICC) were calculated. T2-PD images had 17% higher CNR (15.2) than T2 images (12.6). Original T2 volumes’ ICC was 0.87 for
 rater 1 and 0.84 for rater 2, whereas T2-PD images’ ICC was 0.95 for rater 1 and 0.87 for rater 2. Reliability of hippocampal
 segmentation on T2-PD images was not improved by reformatting images (rater 1 ICC = 0.88, rater 2 ICC = 0.66). Post-acquisition
 processing can improve CNR and hence reliability of hippocampal segmentation in neonate MR scans when tissue contrast is poor.
 These findings may be applied to enhance boundary definition in infant segmentation for various brain structures or in any
 volumetric study where image contrast is sub-optimal, enabling hippocampal structure-function relationships to be explored.
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Content Type &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;Journal Article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Category Original Article&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Pages 1-8&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;DOI 10.1007/s12021-011-9137-7&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Authors&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Deanne K. Thompson, Critical Care and Neurosciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Zohra M. Ahmadzai, Critical Care and Neurosciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Stephen J. Wood, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Melbourne Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Terrie E. Inder, Critical Care and Neurosciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Simon K. Warfield, Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lex W. Doyle, Critical Care and Neurosciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gary F. Egan, Centre for Neuroscience, Florey Neuroscience Institutes, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;parents&quot;&gt;
	&lt;ul class=&quot;details&quot;&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;header labelName&quot;&gt;Journal &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/120559/&quot;&gt;Neuroinformatics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Online ISSN &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;1559-0089&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Print ISSN &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;1539-2791&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:33:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
