<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=2447" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: using-evolutionary-algorithms-for-fitting-high-dimensional-models-to-neuronal-data</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=2447</link>
  <description>&lt;p class=&quot;abstract&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;Abstract&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;Abs1&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;AbstractHeading&quot;&gt;Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;normal&quot;&gt;In the study of neurosciences, and of complex biological systems in general, there is frequently a need to fit mathematical
 models with large numbers of parameters to highly complex datasets. Here we consider algorithms of two different classes,
 gradient following (GF) methods and evolutionary algorithms (EA) and examine their performance in fitting a 9-parameter model
 of a filter-based visual neuron to real data recorded from a sample of 107 neurons in macaque primary visual cortex (V1).
 Although the GF method converged very rapidly on a solution, it was highly susceptible to the effects of local minima in the
 error surface and produced relatively poor fits unless the initial estimates of the parameters were already very good. Conversely,
 although the EA required many more iterations of evaluating the model neuron’s response to a series of stimuli, it ultimately
 found better solutions in nearly all cases and its performance was independent of the starting parameters of the model. Thus,
 although the fitting process was lengthy in terms of processing time, the relative lack of human intervention in the evolutionary
 algorithm, and its ability ultimately to generate model fits that could be trusted as being close to optimal, made it far
 superior in this particular application than the gradient following methods. This is likely to be the case in many further
 complex systems, as are often found in neuroscience.
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Content Type &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;Journal Article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Category Original Article&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Pages 1-20&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;DOI 10.1007/s12021-012-9140-7&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Authors&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Carl-Magnus Svensson, School of Psychology, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, UK&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Stephen Coombes, School of Mathematical Sciences, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, UK&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jonathan Westley Peirce, School of Psychology, University Park, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, UK&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;parents&quot;&gt;
	&lt;ul class=&quot;details&quot;&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;header labelName&quot;&gt;Journal &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/120559/&quot;&gt;Neuroinformatics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Online ISSN &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;1559-0089&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelName&quot;&gt;Print ISSN &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;labelValue&quot;&gt;1539-2791&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 22:10:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
