http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=2994 Just spotted at online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811912003990 is an upcoming 'Comments and Controversies' article in NeuroImage by Karl Friston entitled "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers". Looks like a 'must read' for your summer vacation! Abstract: As an expert reviewer, it is sometimes necessary to ensure a paper is rejected. This can sometimes be achieved by highlighting improper statistical practice. This technical note provides guidance on how to critique the statistical analysis of neuroimaging studies to maximise the chance that the paper will be declined. We will review a series of critiques that can be applied universally to any neuroimaging paper and consider responses to potential rebuttals that reviewers might encounter from authors or editors. en-us Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI Sat, 25 Apr 2026 14:44:10 GMT http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss NITRC RSS generator