<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=4379" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: localizing-hand-motor-area-using-resting-state-fmri--validated-with-direct-cortical-stimulation.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4379</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Localizing hand motor area using resting-state fMRI: validated with direct cortical stimulation.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Sep 24;&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Qiu TM, Yan CG, Tang WJ, Wu JS, Zhuang DX, Yao CJ, Lu JF, Zhu FP, Mao Y, Zhou LF&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        BACKGROUND: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) is a promising tool in clinical application, especially in presurgical mapping for neurosurgery. This study aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of R-fMRI in the localization of hand motor area in patients with brain tumors validated by direct cortical stimulation (DCS). We also compared this technique to task-based blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI (T-fMRI).&lt;br/&gt;
        METHODS: R-fMRI and T-fMRI were acquired from 17 patients with brain tumors. The cortex sites of the hand motor area were recorded by DCS. Site-by-site comparisons between R-fMRI/T-fMRI and DCS were performed to calculate R-fMRI and T-fMRI sensitivity and specificity using DCS as a &quot;gold standard&quot;. R-fMRI and T-fMRI performances were compared statistically RESULTS: A total of 609 cortex sites were tested with DCS and compared with R-fMRI findings in 17 patients. For hand motor area localization, R-fMRI sensitivity and specificity were 90.91 and 89.41 %, respectively. Given that two subjects could not comply with T-fMRI, 520 DCS sites were compared with T-fMRI findings in 15 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of T-fMRI were 78.57 and 84.76 %, respectively. In the 15 patients who successfully underwent both R-fMRI and T-fMRI, there was no statistical difference in sensitivity or specificity between the two methods (p = 0.3198 and p = 0.1431, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: R-fMRI sensitivity and specificity are high for localizing hand motor area and even equivalent or slightly higher compared with T-fMRI. Given its convenience for patients, R-fMRI is a promising substitute for T-fMRI for presurgical mapping.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 25246146 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 5:15:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
