<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=4835" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: improved-sparse-decomposition-based-on-a-smoothed-l0-norm-using-a-laplacian-kernel-to-select-features-from-fmri-data.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4835</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Improved Sparse Decomposition Based on a Smoothed L0 Norm using a Laplacian Kernel to Select Features from fMRI Data.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Feb 11;&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Zhang C, Song S, Wen X, Yao L, Long Z&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        BACKGROUND: Feature selection plays an important role in improving the classification accuracy of multivariate classification techniques in the context of fMRI-based decoding due to the &quot;few samples and large features&quot; nature of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Recently, several sparse representation methods have been applied to the voxel selection of fMRI data. Despite the low computational efficiency of the sparse representation methods, they still displayed promise for applications that select features from fMRI data.&lt;br/&gt;
        NEW METHOD: In this study, we proposed the Laplacian smoothed L0 norm (LSL0) approach for feature selection of fMRI data. Based on the fast sparse decomposition using smoothed L0 norm (SL0) (Mohimani, 2007), the LSL0 method used the Laplacian function to approximate the L0 norm of sources.&lt;br/&gt;
        RESULTS: Results of the simulated and real fMRI data demonstrated the feasibility and robustness of LSL0 for the sparse source estimation and feature selection. Comparison with existing methods: Simulated results indicated that LSL0 produced more accurate source estimation than SL0 at high noise levels. The classification accuracy using voxels that were selected by LSL0 was higher than that by SL0 in both simulated and real fMRI experiment. Moreover, both LSL0 and SL0 showed higher classification accuracy and required less time than ICA and t-test for the fMRI decoding.&lt;br/&gt;
        CONCLUSIONS: LSL0 outperformed SL0 in sparse source estimation at high noise level and in feature selection. Moreover, LSL0 and SL0 showed better performance than ICA and t-test for feature selection.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 25681758 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:48:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
