<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=6281" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: length-matters--improved-high-field-eeg-fmri-recordings-using-shorter-eeg-cables.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6281</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Length matters: Improved high field EEG-fMRI recordings using shorter EEG cables.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;J Neurosci Methods. 2016 May 21;&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Assecondi S, Lavallee C, Ferrari P, Jovicich J&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        BACKGROUND: The use of concurrent EEG-fMRI recordings has increased in recent years, allowing new avenues of medical and cognitive neuroscience research; however, currently used setups present problems with data quality and reproducibility.&lt;br/&gt;
        NEW METHOD: We propose a compact experimental setup for concurrent EEG-fMRI at 4T and compare it to a more standard reference setup. The compact setup uses short EEG cables connecting to the amplifiers, which are placed right at the back of the head RF coil on a form-fitting extension force-locked to the patient MR bed. We compare the two setups in terms of sensitivity to MR-room environmental noise, interferences between measuring devices (EEG or fMRI), and sensitivity to functional responses in a visual stimulation paradigm.&lt;br/&gt;
        RESULTS: The compact setup reduces the system sensitivity to both external noise and MR- induced artefacts by at least 60%, with negligible EEG noise induced from the mechanical vibrations of the cryogenic cooling compression pump.&lt;br/&gt;
        COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The compact setup improved EEG data quality and the overall performance of MR-artifact correction techniques. Both setups were similar in terms of the fMRI data, with higher reproducibility for cable placement within the scanner in the compact setup.&lt;br/&gt;
        CONCLUSIONS: This improved compact setup may be relevant to MR laboratories interested in reducing the sensitivity of their EEG-fMRI experimental setup to external noise sources, setting up an EEG-fMRI workplace for the first time, or for creating a more reproducible configuration of equipment and cables. Implications for safety and ergonomics are discussed.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 27222442 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 19:50:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
