<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=6561" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: assignment-confidence-in-localization-of-the-hand-motor-cortex--comparison-of-structural-imaging-with-functional-mri.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6561</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Assignment Confidence in Localization of the Hand Motor Cortex: Comparison of Structural Imaging With Functional MRI.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Sep 13;:1-8&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Sahin N, Mohan S, Maralani PJ, Duddukuri S, O'Rourke DM, Melhem ER, Wolf RL&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        OBJECTIVE:  The purpose of this study was to assign confidence levels to structural MRI and functional MRI (fMRI) for localization of the primary motor cortex.&lt;br/&gt;
        MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Ninety-one fMRI studies with at least one motor task (178 hemispheres) were identified. Three anatomic assessments were used to localize the primary motor cortex: relation between the superior frontal sulcus and precentral sulcus; cortical thickness; and configuration of the precentral knob. In 105 hemispheres, interreader agreement was assessed for two investigators with different experience levels. Confidence ratings from 0 to 5 (0, no confidence; 5, 100% confidence) were assigned for fMRI and each anatomic localization method.&lt;br/&gt;
        RESULTS:  Cortical thickness had the highest confidence rating (mean, 4.90 ± 0.47 [SD]) with only one failure. The relation between the superior frontal sulcus and precentral sulcus had the lowest confidence rating (4.33 ± 0.91) with three failures. The greatest statistical significance was observed for the cortical thickness and superior frontal sulcus-precentral sulcus methods (post hoc Bonferroni test, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Confidence rating scores were significantly higher for the cortical thickness sign than for fMRI results (4.72 ± 0.54) for a single motor task (post hoc Bonferroni test, p = 0.006); however, the mean confidence rating for fMRI improved to 4.87 ± 0.36 when additional motor tasks were performed. Interreader differences were least for the cortical thickness sign (paired t test, t = 4.25, p &amp;lt; 0.001).&lt;br/&gt;
        CONCLUSION:  Cortical thickness is a better anatomic landmark than fMRI localization for assigning confidence regarding localization of the primary motor cortex; however, localization of motor function is more specific when combined with fMRI findings. Multiple techniques can be used to increase confidence in identifying the hand motor cortex.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 27622286 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 6:40:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
