http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6804 <table border="0" width="100%"><tr><td align="left"/><td align="right"><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&amp;cmd=Link&amp;LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&amp;from_uid=27819557">Related Articles</a></td></tr></table> <p><b>Comparison of magnetoencephalography, functional MRI, and motor evoked potentials in the localization of the sensory-motor cortex.</b></p> <p>Neurol Res. 1995 Oct;17(5):361-367</p> <p>Authors: Morioka T, Yamamoto T, Mizushima A, Tombimatsu S, Shigeto H, Hasuo K, Nishio S, Fujii K, Fukui M</p> <p>Abstract<br/> To clarify the topographical relationship between peri-Rolandic lesions and the central sulcus, we carried out presurgical functional mapping by using magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) on 5 patients. The sensory cortex was identified by somatosensory evoked magnetic fields using MEG (magnetic source imaging (MSI)). The motor area of the hand region was identified using f-MRI, during a hand squeezing task. In addition, transcranial magnetic stimulation localized the hand motor area on the scalp, which was mapped onto the MRI. In all cases, the sensory cortical vein or the lack of any functional activation in the area of peri-lesional edema. MEPs were also unable to localize the entire motor strip. Therefore, at present, MSI is considered to be the most reliable method to localize peri-Rolandic lesions. [Neurol Res 1995; 17: 361-367] cortical vein or the lack of any functional activation in the area of peri-lesional edema. MEPs were also unable to localize the entire motor strip. Therefore, at present, MSI is considered to be the most reliable method to localize peri-Rolandic lesions. [Neurol Res 1995; 17: 361-367].<br/> </p><p>PMID: 27819557 [PubMed - in process]</p> en-us Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI Tue, 05 May 2026 23:24:29 GMT http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss NITRC RSS generator