<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=7818" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: anti-fragmentation-of-resting-state-fmri-connectivity-networks-with-node-wise-thresholding.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=7818</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&amp;amp;cmd=Link&amp;amp;LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&amp;amp;from_uid=28899207&quot;&gt;Related Articles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Anti-fragmentation of resting-state fMRI connectivity networks with node-wise thresholding.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;Brain Connect. 2017 Sep 13;&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Hayasaka S&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        fMRI-based functional connectivity networks are often constructed by thresholding a correlation matrix of nodal time courses. In a typical thresholding approach known as hard thresholding, a single threshold is applied to the entire correlation matrix to identify edges representing super-threshold correlations. However, hard thresholding is known to produce a network with uneven allocation of edges, resulting in a fragmented network with a large number of disconnected nodes. It is suggested that an alternative network thresholding approach, node-wise thresholding, is able to overcome these problems. To examine this, various network characteristics were compared between networks constructed by hard thresholding and node-wise thresholding, with publicly available resting-state fMRI data from 123 healthy young subjects. It was found that networks constructed with hard thresholding included a large number of disconnected nodes, while such network fragmentation was not observed in networks formed with node-wise thresholding. Moreover, in hard thresholding networks, fragmentized modular organization was observed, characterized by a large number of small modules. On the other hand, such modular fragmentation was not observed in node-wise thresholding networks, producing modules that were robust at any threshold and highly consistent across subjects. These results indicate that node-wise thresholding may lead to less fragmented networks. Moreover, node-wise thresholding enables robust characterization of network properties without much influence by the selection of a threshold.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 28899207 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 8:40:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
