<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=7877" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: is-hunger-important-to-model-in-fmri-visual-food-cue-reactivity-paradigms-in-adults-with-obesity-and-how-should-this-be-done-</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=7877</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Is hunger important to model in fMRI visual food-cue reactivity paradigms in adults with obesity and how should this be done?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;Appetite. 2017 Sep 27;:&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Chin SH, Kahathuduwa CN, Stearns MB, Davis T, Binks M&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        We considered 1) influence of self-reported hunger in behavioral and fMRI food-cue reactivity (fMRI-FCR) 2) optimal methods to model this. Adults (N = 32; 19-60 years; F = 21; BMI 30-39.9 kg/m(2)) participated in an fMRI-FCR task that required rating 240 images of food and matched objects for 'appeal'. Hunger, satiety, thirst, fullness and emptiness were measured pre- and post-scan (visual analogue scales). Hunger, satiety, fullness and emptiness were combined to form a latent factor (appetite). Post-vs. pre-scores were compared using paired t-tests. In mixed-effects models, appeal/fMRI-FCR responses were regressed on image (i.e. food/objects), with random intercepts and slopes of image for functional runs nested within subjects. Each of hunger, satiety, thirst, fullness, emptiness and appetite were added as covariates in 4 forms (separate models): 1) change; 2) post- and pre-mean; 3) pre-; 4) change and pre-. Satiety decreased (Δ = -13.39, p = 0.001) and thirst increased (Δ = 11.78, p = 0.006) during the scan. Changes in other constructs were not significant (p &amp;gt; 0.05). Including covariates did not influence food vs. object contrast of appeal ratings/fMRI-FCR. Significant image X covariate interactions were observed in some fMRI models. However, including these constructs did not improve the overall model fit. While some subjective, self-reported hunger, satiety and related constructs may be moderating fMRI-FCR, these constructs do not appear to be salient influences on appeal/fMRI-FCR in people with obesity undergoing fMRI.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 28964904 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 2:07:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
