<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=8290" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: characterizing-the-modulation-of-resting-state-fmri-metrics-by-baseline-physiology.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8290</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Characterizing the modulation of resting-state fMRI metrics by baseline physiology.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 13;:&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Chu PPW, Golestani AM, Kwinta JB, Khatamian YB, Chen JJ&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        The blood-oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal is commonly used to assess functional connectivity across brain regions, particularly in the resting state (rs-fMRI). However, the BOLD fMRI signal is not merely a representation of neural activity, but a combination of neural activity and vascular response. These aspects of the BOLD signal are easily influenced by systemic physiology, potentially biasing BOLD-based functional connectivity measurements. In this work, we focus on the following physiological modulators of the BOLD signal: cerebral blood flow (CBF), venous blood oxygenation, and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). We use simulations and experiments to examine the relationship between the physiological parameters and rs-fMRI functional connectivity measurements in three resting-state networks: default mode network, somatosensory network and visual network. By using the general linear model, we demonstrate that physiological modulators significantly impact functional connectivity measurements in these regions, but in a manner that depends on the interplay between signal- and noise-driven correlations. Moreover, we find that the physiological effects vary by brain region and depend on the range of physiological conditions probed; the associations are more complex than previously reported. The results confirm that it is important to account for the effect of physiological modulators when comparing resting-state fMRI metrics. We note that such modulatory effects may be amplified by disease conditions, which will warrant future investigations.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 29452265 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:35:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
