<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=8322" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: consistency-and-similarity-of-meg--and-fmri-signal-time-courses-during-movie-viewing.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8322</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Consistency and similarity of MEG- and fMRI-signal time courses during movie viewing.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 24;:&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Lankinen K, Saari J, Hlushchuk Y, Tikka P, Parkkonen L, Hari R, Koskinen M&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        Movie-viewing allows human perception and cognition to be studied in complex, real-life-like situations in a brain-imaging laboratory. Previous studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and with magneto- and electroencephalography (MEG/EEG) have demonstrated consistent temporal dynamics of brain activity across movie viewers. However, little is known about the similarities and differences of fMRI and MEG/EEG dynamics during such naturalistic situations. We thus compared MEG and fMRI responses to the same 15-min black-and-white movie in the same eight subjects who watched the movie twice during both MEG and fMRI recordings. We analyzed intra- and intersubject voxel-wise correlations within each imaging modality as well as the correlation of the MEG envelopes and fMRI signals. The fMRI signals showed voxel-wise within- and between-subjects correlations up to r = 0.66 and r = 0.37, respectively, whereas these correlations were clearly weaker for the envelopes of band-pass filtered (7 frequency bands below 100 Hz) MEG signals (within-subjects correlation r &amp;lt; 0.14 and between-subjects r &amp;lt; 0.05). Direct MEG-fMRI voxel-wise correlations were unreliable. Notably, applying a spatial-filtering approach to the MEG data uncovered consistent canonical variates that showed considerably stronger (up to r = 0.25) between-subjects correlations than the univariate voxel-wise analysis. Furthermore, the envelopes of the time courses of these variates below 11 Hz showed association with fMRI signals in a general linear model. Similarities between envelopes of MEG canonical variates and fMRI voxel time-courses were seen mostly in occipital, but also in temporal and frontal brain regions, whereas the strongest intra- and intersubject correlations for MEG and fMRI separately were strongest only in the occipital areas. In contrast to the conventional univariate analysis, the spatial-filtering approach was able to uncover associations between the MEG envelopes and fMRI time courses, shedding light on the similarities of hemodynamic and electromagnetic brain activity during movie-viewing.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 29486325 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:49:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
