<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=8812" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: preoperative-mapping-of-the-supplementary-motor-area-in-patients-with-brain-tumor-using-resting-state-fmri-with-seed-based-analysis.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8812</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&amp;amp;cmd=Link&amp;amp;LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&amp;amp;from_uid=30002054&quot;&gt;Related Articles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Preoperative Mapping of the Supplementary Motor Area in Patients with Brain Tumor Using Resting-State fMRI with Seed-Based Analysis.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jul 12;:&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Wongsripuemtet J, Tyan AE, Carass A, Agarwal S, Gujar SK, Pillai JJ, Sair HI&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The supplementary motor area can be a critical region in the preoperative planning of patients undergoing brain tumor resection because it plays a role in both language and motor function. While primary motor regions have been successfully identified using resting-state fMRI, there is variability in the literature regarding the identification of the supplementary motor area for preoperative planning. The purpose of our study was to compare resting-state fMRI to task-based fMRI for localization of the supplementary motor area in a large cohort of patients with brain tumors presenting for preoperative brain mapping.&lt;br/&gt;
        MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with brain tumors were evaluated with resting-state fMRI using seed-based analysis of hand and orofacial motor regions. Rates of supplementary motor area localization were compared with those in healthy controls and with localization results by task-based fMRI.&lt;br/&gt;
        RESULTS: Localization of the supplementary motor area using hand motor seed regions was more effective than seeding using orofacial motor regions for both patients with brain tumor (95.5% versus 34.8%, P &amp;lt; .001) and controls (95.2% versus 45.2%, P &amp;lt; .001). Bilateral hand motor seeding was superior to unilateral hand motor seeding in patients with brain tumor for either side (95.5% versus 75.8%/75.8% for right/left, P &amp;lt; .001). No difference was found in the ability to identify the supplementary motor area between patients with brain tumors and controls.&lt;br/&gt;
        CONCLUSIONS: In addition to task-based fMRI, seed-based analysis of resting-state fMRI represents an equally effective method for supplementary motor area localization in patients with brain tumors, with the best results obtained with bilateral hand motor region seeding.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 30002054 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:31:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
