<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=8957" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: gradient-echo-and-spin-echo-blood-oxygenation-level-dependent-functional-mri-at-ultrahigh-fields-of-9.4-and-15.2-tesla.</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8957</link>
  <description>
	&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;100%&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;/&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Gradient-echo and spin-echo blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI at ultrahigh fields of 9.4 and 15.2 Tesla.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;          
        &lt;p&gt;Magn Reson Med. 2018 Sep 05;:&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Authors:  Han S, Son JP, Cho H, Park JY, Kim SG&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br/&gt;
        PURPOSE: Sensitivity and specificity of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) is sensitive to magnetic field strength and acquisition methods. We have investigated gradient-echo (GE)- and spin-echo (SE)-BOLD fMRI at ultrahigh fields of 9.4 and 15.2  Tesla.&lt;br/&gt;
        METHODS: BOLD fMRI experiments responding to forepaw stimulation were performed with 3 echo times (TE) at each echo type and B0 in α-chloralose-anesthetized rats. The contralateral forelimb somatosensory region was selected for quantitative analyses.&lt;br/&gt;
        RESULTS: At 9.4 T and 15.2 T, average baseline T2* (n = 9) was 26.6 and 17.1 msec, whereas baseline T2 value (n = 9) was 35.7 and 24.5 msec, respectively. Averaged stimulation-induced ΔR2* was -1.72 s-1 at 9.4 T and -3.09 s-1 at 15.2 T, whereas ΔR2 was -1.19 s-1 at 9.4 T and -1.97 s-1 at 15.2 T. At the optimal TE of tissue T2* or T2 , BOLD percent changes were slightly higher at 15.2 T than at 9.4 T (GE: 7.4% versus 6.4% and SE: 5.7% versus 5.4%). The ΔR2* and ΔR2 ratio of 15.2 T to 9.4 T was 1.8 and 1.66, respectively. The ratio of the macrovessel-containing superficial to microvessel-dominant parenchymal BOLD signal was 1.73 to 1.76 for GE-BOLD versus 1.13 to 1.19 for SE-BOLD, indicating that the SE-BOLD contrast is less sensitive to macrovessels than GE-BOLD.&lt;br/&gt;
        CONCLUSION: SE-BOLD fMRI improves spatial specificity to microvessels compared to GE-BOLD at both fields. BOLD sensitivity is similar at the both fields and can be improved at ultrahigh fields only for thermal-noise-dominant ultrahigh-resolution fMRI.&lt;br/&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PMID: 30183108 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:01:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
