<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.xsl.php?feed=https://www.nitrc.org/export/rss20_forum.php?forum_id=9123" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.nitrc.org/themes/nitrc3.0/css/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>
  <title>NITRC News Group Forum: ica-aroma-agg-vs-non-agg</title>
  <link>http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=9123</link>
  <description> &lt;p&gt;I just want to clarify something. If we’re using the aggressive denoising strategy on the &lt;code&gt;_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz&lt;/code&gt; data, do we also need to include the motion parameters (&lt;code&gt;trans_x trans_y trans_z rot_x rot_y rot_z&lt;/code&gt;) in our nuisance regression, or will they already be regressed out by the ICA-AROMA confounds?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I realize that we would want to include these motion parameters in a nuisance regression if we were just using the &lt;code&gt;_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz&lt;/code&gt; data without ICA-AROMA denoising; however, does it make sense to include them with  &lt;code&gt;_desc-preproc_bold.nii.gz&lt;/code&gt; + aggressive ICA-AROMA confounds, (or even for analyzing the non-aggressive &lt;code&gt;smoothAROMAnonaggr_bold.nii.gz&lt;/code&gt; data?).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2000-2026 NITRC OSI</copyright>
  <webMaster></webMaster>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:19:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>NITRC RSS generator</generator>
 </channel>
</rss>
