open-discussion > Thresholding
Showing 1-5 of 5 posts
Jan 10, 2022 01:01 PM | TANMAYEE SAMANTARAY
Thresholding
Dear all,
I have a weighted correlation matrix for which I need to find various metrics like clustering coefficient, path length etc based on specific threshold values. Since the matrix has all non-zero elements, please suggest me on how to find threshold based on sparsity?
I have a weighted correlation matrix for which I need to find various metrics like clustering coefficient, path length etc based on specific threshold values. Since the matrix has all non-zero elements, please suggest me on how to find threshold based on sparsity?
Jan 13, 2022 09:01 PM | Zeus Gracia-Tabuenca - University of Zaragoza
RE: Thresholding
Hi,
There is not a golden rule for thresholding, but for the path-length is reasonable to remove at least the negative distances. My suggestion is to test your sample inferences at least in several sparsity levels to evaluate the robustness of your results. (e.g., from 5-40% of sparsity in steps of 5%).
For more info, this is a good start for the topic: https://youtu.be/MZEQR7gKfNE
Best,
Zeus.
There is not a golden rule for thresholding, but for the path-length is reasonable to remove at least the negative distances. My suggestion is to test your sample inferences at least in several sparsity levels to evaluate the robustness of your results. (e.g., from 5-40% of sparsity in steps of 5%).
For more info, this is a good start for the topic: https://youtu.be/MZEQR7gKfNE
Best,
Zeus.
Jan 14, 2022 01:01 PM | TANMAYEE SAMANTARAY
RE: Thresholding
Thanks Zeus.. I observed that sparsity and density are exactly the
opposite things, considered in many studies. A Sparsity of
20% ignores 20 % of the connections and considers top 80% of the
connections, while a density of 20% considers 20% and ignores the
rest. Hope I understood it right.
Feb 16, 2022 07:02 PM | Zeus Gracia-Tabuenca - University of Zaragoza
RE: Thresholding
Originally posted by TANMAYEE SAMANTARAY:
Yes, you are right. I meant density when I was talking about sparsity. Sorry. I'd apply different levels of density (such as: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3272-1... or https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.202...).
Thanks Zeus.. I observed that sparsity and
density are exactly the opposite things, considered in many
studies. A Sparsity of 20% ignores 20 % of the connections and
considers top 80% of the connections, while a density of 20%
considers 20% and ignores the rest. Hope I understood it
right.
Yes, you are right. I meant density when I was talking about sparsity. Sorry. I'd apply different levels of density (such as: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3272-1... or https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.202...).