help
help > Following up on this problem
Aug 24, 2017 01:08 PM | Haeme Park
Following up on this problem
Hi Dmit,
I was wondering if you've solved your problem at all as I have exactly the same question! Otherwise, if anyone else has any ideas on how to get around this problem (changing 'nscans' to the total number of scans to make gPPI work results in one constant regressor, when multiple constants are needed to define the concatenated sessions), it would be greatly appreciated if you could share.
Thank you!
I was wondering if you've solved your problem at all as I have exactly the same question! Otherwise, if anyone else has any ideas on how to get around this problem (changing 'nscans' to the total number of scans to make gPPI work results in one constant regressor, when multiple constants are needed to define the concatenated sessions), it would be greatly appreciated if you could share.
Thank you!
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Dmit Filin | Aug 14, 2017 | |
Robin P | Jan 25, 2021 | |
Haeme Park | Aug 24, 2017 | |
Donald McLaren | Aug 24, 2017 | |
Dmit Filin | Aug 24, 2017 | |
Donald McLaren | Aug 24, 2017 | |
Dmit Filin | Aug 24, 2017 | |
Donald McLaren | Aug 24, 2017 | |