sdm-help-list
sdm-help-list > Estimate interpretation
Aug 7, 2018 08:08 AM | Arnaud Leroy
Estimate interpretation
Hi all,
I have a naive question about the interpretation of the meta-regression results.
I have significant regions for the contrast patients > controls (Z positive) and regions for the contrast controls > patients (Z negative).
How can I interprete it with my regressor ? Does it increase the effect of the contrast (if the score of my regressor increase the contrast increase) ? Is there another way to interprete it (I don't know how to interprete the negative estimate for deactivation: when the regressor increases, the deactivation increases ? or decreases ?)
In another way, how can I know the way of the interaction ?
Than you for your help
AL
I have a naive question about the interpretation of the meta-regression results.
I have significant regions for the contrast patients > controls (Z positive) and regions for the contrast controls > patients (Z negative).
How can I interprete it with my regressor ? Does it increase the effect of the contrast (if the score of my regressor increase the contrast increase) ? Is there another way to interprete it (I don't know how to interprete the negative estimate for deactivation: when the regressor increases, the deactivation increases ? or decreases ?)
In another way, how can I know the way of the interaction ?
Than you for your help
AL
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Arnaud Leroy | Aug 7, 2018 | |
Joaquim Radua | Dec 5, 2018 | |