help > RE: covariates (of interest and control) set-up
Nov 9, 2018  01:11 AM | therese1
RE: covariates (of interest and control) set-up

Bumping this up. Any help welcome!



Originally posted by therese1:
Originally posted by therese1:
Hello Alfonso,
I'd love to get your opinion on the questions below. I'd greatly appreciate any help you can offer.
Many thanks,

Please can you advise whether I have set up covariates correctly for a GLM 2nd level analysis.

Covariates of interest:
AllSubjects [1,1,1,1,1....1,1,1]
Patients [1,1,1,1.......0,0,0]
Controls [0,0,0,0.......1,1,1]
Test_1 [-6.75, 0.18, -4.25.....]
Test_2 [-0.63, 0.92, -1.46,.....]

Control covariates:
Age (demeaned) [3.16, 10.16, -9.56.....]
Education (demeaned)  [-0.33, 4.66, -2.33,....]
Gender [-0.5, -0.5, 0.5, 0.5,....]

All covariates also have a sub-group version e.g. Test_1_Patients, Gender_Controls.

Question 1:
The test scores, for each test, are normalised based on a population sample matched for education, gender & age (i.e., the score for person 1 and person 2 may have been normalised based on different populations. Formula score - population mean / population SD). In this case zero is meaningful. Do these need to be further normalised at a whole group level?

Question 2:
Are the control convariates set up correctly? I have read conflicting items on how to set up gender.

Question 3:
I have selected semi-partial correlations for ROI-to-ROI investigation.

One analysis is set up as:
Test_1_Controls > Test_1_Patients; one-sided positive
[0,0, -1, 1, 0, 0, 0] referring to [Patients, Controls, Test_1_Patients, Test_1_Controls, Gender, Age, Education]

Is it correct to say that this set up is testing whether in relation to Test_1 controls show higher ROI-to-ROI functional connectivity compared to patients while controlling for gender, age and education?

Thank you in advance for any assistance.


Threaded View

therese1 Oct 30, 2018
therese1 Nov 6, 2018
RE: covariates (of interest and control) set-up
therese1 Nov 9, 2018
Jeff Browndyke Nov 9, 2018