open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Licenses...
Apr 28, 2009 10:04 PM | Luis Ibanez
RE: Licenses...
Daniel,
I very much agree with the points you made.
and wanted to particularly emphasize one of them:
You mention:
"(I've seen a lot of boilerplate text amounting to “free for academic use,” which immediately rules out the GPL and BSD licenses.)"
Let's clarify that any license that includes restrictions like:
* "For academic use only" or
* "Free for research only"
can not be considered an Open Source license because it excludes a field of endeavor. Something that is contrary to item 6 of the Open Source Definition:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd
Luis
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| David Kennedy | Apr 28, 2009 | |
| Luis Ibanez | Apr 28, 2009 | |
| Daniel Kimberg | Apr 28, 2009 | |
| Thinh Nguyen | May 13, 2009 | |
| Luis Ibanez | May 17, 2009 | |
| Christian Haselgrove | May 18, 2009 | |
| Luis Ibanez | Apr 28, 2009 | |
| Bennett Landman | Apr 28, 2009 | |
