devel
devel > Re: [gifti-devel forum] updated caret gifti files
Dec 2, 2009 09:12 PM | Richard Reynolds
Re: [gifti-devel forum] updated caret gifti files
It just threw me a bit because these are new attributes of the
GIFTI element, which seems to amount to a small change in the GIFTI
format.
So do we need to add such attributes to the DTD, or perhaps mention them in the Format doc? From a programming point of view, they should be considered valid attributes. As of now, they are considered invalid, and gifticlib whines.
Keeping a list of valid non-gifti attributes is okay with me, which seems appropriate for these. I would just prefer a fixed list of what is acceptable.
- rick
So do we need to add such attributes to the DTD, or perhaps mention them in the Format doc? From a programming point of view, they should be considered valid attributes. As of now, they are considered invalid, and gifticlib whines.
Keeping a list of valid non-gifti attributes is okay with me, which seems appropriate for these. I would just prefer a fixed list of what is acceptable.
- rick
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| John Harwell | Dec 2, 2009 | |
| Richard Reynolds | Dec 15, 2009 | |
| John Harwell | Dec 16, 2009 | |
| Richard Reynolds | Dec 16, 2009 | |
| Richard Reynolds | Dec 2, 2009 | |
