Ratings & Reviews   User Reviews  ( 18 )   Published Reviews  ( 6 )
Overall: 4.5 star averageInstallation: 3.5 star averageDocumentation: 3.5 star average

Individual Rating Results for AFNI

Review 18 of AFNI on Apr 19, 2010
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  3 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  2 stars
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  The software requires intensive command-line operations, which might be troublesome for users who prefer GUIs.

Review 17 of AFNI on Oct 20, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  4 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 stars

Review 16 of AFNI on Oct 18, 2009
Version Reviewed:  NA
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  3 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  3 stars
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  good powerful but difficult to learn

Review 15 of AFNI on Oct 18, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  4 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 stars
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  AFNI requires some knowledge of C-shell scripting to use, but it is an extremely accessible tool. The program is customizable and has an active user community that are extremely prolific. It is an excellent imaging tool.

Review 14 of AFNI on Jun 21, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  3 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  3 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  2 stars
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  It's cool, if you really enjoy unix. Essentially no usable UI. Math is valid. File naming conventions are... unique. Clings obtusely to .brik and .head files.

Review 13 of AFNI on Jun 21, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  4 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 stars
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  This program requires a little more time to familiarize yourself with it than others, but there is a reward, in that it is extremely flexible.

Review 12 of AFNI on Jun 21, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  3 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  4 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  3 stars
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  powerful tool, but difficult learning curve and poor documentation

Review 11 of AFNI on Jun 20, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  4 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  4 stars

Review 10 of AFNI on Mar 22, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  3 stars
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  possibly the most comprehensive analysis package available...although the learning curve is probably a little steeper than for some of the other packages, it is well worth the effort

Review 9 of AFNI on Nov 18, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 stars
Download/Installation Ease:  5 stars
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 stars
Other Comments/Similar Tools:  good for use in MEG analysis with co-registration of anatomical fiducials

Next 10>>>