open-discussion
open-discussion > problems with original digitizer data (.pos file) after converting to .nirs
Jul 20, 2021 10:07 AM | Alex Niephaus
problems with original digitizer data (.pos file) after converting to .nirs
Hello there,
I ran into a problem after using our original .pos files for the conversion from hitachi to .nirs
When we open the converted data in Homer3, it changes the .nirs to .snirf and displays the probe array. But the view is off and the channels don't seem to correspond to the optodes anymore. If we ran the script with the provided default 3x5.pos file, no such problem occurs.
I'm not sure, what we can do about that. The only difference between original and default file we found is the version: default=2.0, ours=2.2
We checked the .pos file for plausibility using AtlasViewer and the positioning makes sense and fits our setup.
We hope that you can give us a hint or advice in how to go from here?
Greetings,
Alex
P.S: You can find a picture comparing both approaches in the attachement
I ran into a problem after using our original .pos files for the conversion from hitachi to .nirs
When we open the converted data in Homer3, it changes the .nirs to .snirf and displays the probe array. But the view is off and the channels don't seem to correspond to the optodes anymore. If we ran the script with the provided default 3x5.pos file, no such problem occurs.
I'm not sure, what we can do about that. The only difference between original and default file we found is the version: default=2.0, ours=2.2
We checked the .pos file for plausibility using AtlasViewer and the positioning makes sense and fits our setup.
We hope that you can give us a hint or advice in how to go from here?
Greetings,
Alex
P.S: You can find a picture comparing both approaches in the attachement
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Alex Niephaus | Jul 20, 2021 | |
Rebecca Dewey | Jul 20, 2021 | |
Alex Niephaus | Jul 20, 2021 | |
Rebecca Dewey | Jul 20, 2021 | |