sdm-help-list > threshold
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts
Mar 7, 2016 04:03 PM | Nobody
threshold
Hi,
it's written in SDM Tutorial: " While different studies may employ different thresholds, you should ensure that the same threshold throughout the whole brain was used within each included study ".
So, if in some studies, I found that:
"Task-related responses were generally
considered significant if they consisted of at least 5 contiguous
voxels that exceeded an uncorrected threshold of P < 0.001,
although in a few cases, when exploring details of individual
differences, we used a more liberal threshold, P < 0.005."
Can't I use those studies to conduct a meta-analisys?
Best regards.
Roberta
it's written in SDM Tutorial: " While different studies may employ different thresholds, you should ensure that the same threshold throughout the whole brain was used within each included study ".
So, if in some studies, I found that:
"Task-related responses were generally
considered significant if they consisted of at least 5 contiguous
voxels that exceeded an uncorrected threshold of P < 0.001,
although in a few cases, when exploring details of individual
differences, we used a more liberal threshold, P < 0.005."
Can't I use those studies to conduct a meta-analisys?
Best regards.
Roberta
Apr 8, 2016 11:04 AM | Nobody
RE: threshold
Dear Roberta,
the short answer is that you should discard them. However, if you manage to know which of the clusters obtained using P < 0.005 would not be obtained using P < 0.001, then you include the studies but discard these clusters. The problem is that knowing this may not be straightforward...
Hope this helps,
Joaquim
the short answer is that you should discard them. However, if you manage to know which of the clusters obtained using P < 0.005 would not be obtained using P < 0.001, then you include the studies but discard these clusters. The problem is that knowing this may not be straightforward...
Hope this helps,
Joaquim
