open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: co-registration issue
Feb 20, 2017 08:02 PM | Martin Styner
RE: co-registration issue
Hi Jeongchul
We are currently manually editing the DTI brain masks and will make them public as soon as that is done (probably by June).
Re field map: No, we did not acquire any field map.
Re DICOM: Not sure why it would be needed, as one easily convert the NRRD data to Nifti (e.g. using DWIConvert/DWIConverter in 3D Slicer). The issue with the DICOM data is that some datasets have incorrect DICOM orientation information, which we corrected.
Re FLIRT:, FLIRT won't be enough for an appropriate correction for the distortions in the diffusion data. The data has significant distortions in the anterior temporal lobe area, which need a non-linear registration (FLIRT is a linear registration tool).
Martin
We are currently manually editing the DTI brain masks and will make them public as soon as that is done (probably by June).
Re field map: No, we did not acquire any field map.
Re DICOM: Not sure why it would be needed, as one easily convert the NRRD data to Nifti (e.g. using DWIConvert/DWIConverter in 3D Slicer). The issue with the DICOM data is that some datasets have incorrect DICOM orientation information, which we corrected.
Re FLIRT:, FLIRT won't be enough for an appropriate correction for the distortions in the diffusion data. The data has significant distortions in the anterior temporal lobe area, which need a non-linear registration (FLIRT is a linear registration tool).
Martin
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Jeongchul Kim | Feb 20, 2017 | |
| Jeongchul Kim | Feb 22, 2017 | |
| Martin Styner | Feb 20, 2017 | |
