From reading Dr. Radua's 2012 paper (A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps) in the threshold step in the tutorial I put probability=0.005, extent threshold = 10 and chose "_uncorrp" and get no coordinates as mentioned in my previous post.

However, if I change the probability to 0.09 (or higher) I get coordinates (and only on this map and not any other map). Does this mean that my meta-analysis is not statistically significant?

Also, are the probability value, extent threshold, and map (_uncorrp, as opposed to "_corrp_tfce" which was suggested in the tutorial) I am selecting in this step correct? Or do you recommend I select different options for these?

I'd really appreciate a reply from you

Thanks so much

Avi