open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Shared NIRS Data Format - SNIRF
Oct 22, 2012 04:10 PM | Mathieu Coursolle
RE: Shared NIRS Data Format - SNIRF
Hi,
Thanks for sharing this draft specification. Here are a few small (late) comments I'd like to share on the latest version.
Our new NIRS system should be released in a few months, and we made it very modular. The system can be made from any combination of up to 4 "blocks", each having the potential of having a different number of sources, detectors and wavelengths (as well as different wavelength values).
That being said, I just wanted to make sure that the specification doesn't enforce the usage of all wavelengths available on the system for all measurements (I may be wrong, but I do believe it was the case for the Matlab based .nirs file format).
In the description of the "ml" structure, there is a note specifying that "source indices generally refer to the optode naming (probe positions)". I assume that it is the same for detectors?
In the optional variables, the "qform" variable specified a 4x4 matrix to align the NIRS coordinate system to other geometries. Would it be useful to have an additionnal variable that describes that geometry (ex: MNI, Talairach, anatomical, etc) ? I am thinking of something that may be similar to the NIfTI file format.
Also, are there any constraints in terms of endianness of the file, and/or type encoding of the different variables?
Thank you,
Mathieu Coursolle
Rogue Research Inc.
Thanks for sharing this draft specification. Here are a few small (late) comments I'd like to share on the latest version.
Our new NIRS system should be released in a few months, and we made it very modular. The system can be made from any combination of up to 4 "blocks", each having the potential of having a different number of sources, detectors and wavelengths (as well as different wavelength values).
That being said, I just wanted to make sure that the specification doesn't enforce the usage of all wavelengths available on the system for all measurements (I may be wrong, but I do believe it was the case for the Matlab based .nirs file format).
In the description of the "ml" structure, there is a note specifying that "source indices generally refer to the optode naming (probe positions)". I assume that it is the same for detectors?
In the optional variables, the "qform" variable specified a 4x4 matrix to align the NIRS coordinate system to other geometries. Would it be useful to have an additionnal variable that describes that geometry (ex: MNI, Talairach, anatomical, etc) ? I am thinking of something that may be similar to the NIfTI file format.
Also, are there any constraints in terms of endianness of the file, and/or type encoding of the different variables?
Thank you,
Mathieu Coursolle
Rogue Research Inc.
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| David Boas | Oct 19, 2012 | |
| David Boas | Aug 1, 2013 | |
| Mathieu Coursolle | Apr 2, 2013 | |
| Mathieu Coursolle | Apr 15, 2013 | |
| David Boas | Jul 31, 2013 | |
| David Boas | Jul 31, 2013 | |
| David Boas | Nov 20, 2012 | |
| Alex Cristia | Nov 20, 2012 | |
| Alex Cristia | Nov 5, 2012 | |
| David Boas | Nov 16, 2012 | |
| Mathieu Coursolle | Nov 16, 2012 | |
| Alessandro Torricelli | Oct 25, 2012 | |
| Blaise Frederick | Oct 26, 2012 | |
| David Boas | Nov 5, 2012 | |
| Alessandro Torricelli | Oct 25, 2012 | |
| Mathieu Coursolle | Oct 22, 2012 | |
| Blaise Frederick | Oct 22, 2012 | |
| David Boas | Nov 5, 2012 | |
| Mathieu Coursolle | Nov 20, 2012 | |
