open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Is slice-timing necessary for resting-state?
Feb 28, 2013 04:02 PM | Ben Turner
RE: Is slice-timing necessary for resting-state?
Hi Zhiyuan - I think the answer to this question depends on what
sort of analysis you are doing. If you are using something like
ALFF or coherence, it shouldn't matter (as these operate in the
frequency domain and ignore phase information). However, if you are
using correlation (for functional connectivity) or ReHo, it will
make a difference: the correlation between an HRF and itself
time-shifted by 1.95s (about the longest lag between slice
acquisitions assuming a 2s TR and 37 slices) is only .79, so two
identical time-series (before sampling) in voxels from these two
slices would have a correlation lower than 1. And depending on the
acquisition order, this might introduce strange artifacts into the
results that would be hard to detect (for instance, if your scanner
goes odds-ascend-evens-descend, slices at the top of the volume
were collected very close together in time, while those at the
bottom were collected maximally distantly, so ReHo will have a
spatial bias).
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Zhiyuan Wang | Feb 28, 2013 | |
| Ben Turner | Feb 28, 2013 | |
| Enrico Glerean | Feb 28, 2013 | |
| Zhiyuan Wang | Mar 2, 2013 | |
| Zhiyuan Wang | Mar 2, 2013 | |
