help > Interpreting SPHARM-PDM output results
Jun 26, 2015  01:06 PM | Beatriz Paniagua
Interpreting SPHARM-PDM output results
Hi Zohreh,


Thanks. 

1. Did you run your results using the ShapeAnalysisModule command or just running intermediate commands one-by-one? Running one by one is useful to diagnose problems, but it would be helpful if you could run the whole shape analysis pipeline via ShapeAnalysisModule and attach a zipped version of your output folder.

2. If I am guessing correctly, segpostprocess worked ok (your files Output Image1 look ok - by the way just an advice, refrain from using spaces in folder names and outputs, underscore is ok "_"), but something went wrong in ParaToSPHARM, when editing the surfSPHARM meshes you attach the vertices have NAN values. 

3. As Martin said, at the moment we do not provide support for SPHARM coefficient analysis. We do provide the coefficients in the *surfSPHARM.coef in an ASCII file that can be read with any standard i/o library, and have plenty of collaborators that have analyzed them by designing their own protocols. 

I hope that helps,

Beatriz

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Mojdeh Zamyadi Mar 6, 2015
Beatriz Paniagua Mar 6, 2015
Mojdeh Zamyadi Mar 10, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 19, 2015
Martin Styner Jun 22, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 24, 2015
Beatriz Paniagua Jun 24, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
Beatriz Paniagua Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
Beatriz Paniagua Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
Beatriz Paniagua Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 26, 2015
Interpreting SPHARM-PDM output results
Beatriz Paniagua Jun 26, 2015
Martin Styner Jun 26, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
zohreh kohan Jun 25, 2015
Martin Styner Jun 23, 2015