questions
questions > RE: dcm2niix Image Flip
May 19, 2017 06:05 PM | Anderson Napolitano - The University of New Mexico
RE: dcm2niix Image Flip
Hi Dr. Rorden,
Thank you so much. Such orientation difference really does explain the difference in affine matrices. I derived my dicom image's affine based-off the following dicom attributes:
(0010,2210) Anatomical Orientation
(7FE0,0010) Pixel Data
(0028,0030) Pixel Spacing
(0020,0032) Image Position Patient
(0020,0032) Image Orientation Patient
and I was able to derive my dcm2niix-converted image's affine matrix from a permutation matrix multiplied to the affine.
Bottom line is your software, dcm2niix, is flawless and I just did not pay enough attention to details.
Thank you so much Dr. Rorden. I really appreciate your help.
Regards,
Anderson
Thank you so much. Such orientation difference really does explain the difference in affine matrices. I derived my dicom image's affine based-off the following dicom attributes:
(0010,2210) Anatomical Orientation
(7FE0,0010) Pixel Data
(0028,0030) Pixel Spacing
(0020,0032) Image Position Patient
(0020,0032) Image Orientation Patient
and I was able to derive my dcm2niix-converted image's affine matrix from a permutation matrix multiplied to the affine.
Bottom line is your software, dcm2niix, is flawless and I just did not pay enough attention to details.
Thank you so much Dr. Rorden. I really appreciate your help.
Regards,
Anderson
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Anderson Napolitano | May 17, 2017 | |
Anderson Napolitano | May 18, 2017 | |
Chris Rorden | May 19, 2017 | |
Lindsay Quandt | Aug 15, 2017 | |
Chris Rorden | Aug 19, 2017 | |
Chris Rorden | Aug 16, 2017 | |
Anderson Napolitano | May 19, 2017 | |
Chris Rorden | May 18, 2017 | |
Anderson Napolitano | May 18, 2017 | |