indi
indi > RE: Acquisition order
Nov 24, 2010 08:11 PM | Michael Milham
RE: Acquisition order
Michel,
Good question...it is ascending interleaved - even then odd slices.
Best,
Mike
Originally posted by Michel Grothe:
Good question...it is ascending interleaved - even then odd slices.
Best,
Mike
Originally posted by Michel Grothe:
Dear INDI-team, thank you very much for the fast
update of the age-data.
Next day, next question (I promise I won´t go on at this rhythm),
I´m not quite sure how to read the fMRI protocol:
I guess the attribute "interleaved" in the "Geometry"-section refers to the acquisition order of the axial (transversal) slices, but how can I know if this is an ascending (i.e. bottom->up) or descending (top->down) acquisition order?
Don´t want to mess it all up in the very first processing step :-)
Thanks in advance for any hints on this,
Michel
[/userquote]
Next day, next question (I promise I won´t go on at this rhythm),
I´m not quite sure how to read the fMRI protocol:
I guess the attribute "interleaved" in the "Geometry"-section refers to the acquisition order of the axial (transversal) slices, but how can I know if this is an ascending (i.e. bottom->up) or descending (top->down) acquisition order?
Don´t want to mess it all up in the very first processing step :-)
Thanks in advance for any hints on this,
Michel
[/userquote]
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Michel Grothe | Nov 24, 2010 | |
| Pierre Bellec | Nov 29, 2010 | |
| Michael Milham | Nov 30, 2010 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Aug 2, 2011 | |
| Arno Klein | May 26, 2011 | |
| Clare Kelly | May 27, 2011 | |
| Xiaozhen You | Apr 1, 2011 | |
| Michael Milham | Nov 24, 2010 | |
| Michel Grothe | Nov 25, 2010 | |
| Michael Milham | Nov 28, 2010 | |
