general > RE: Getting original vs. transformed cell coordinats
Aug 21, 2020  11:08 AM | Sharon Christine Yates - University of Oslo
RE: Getting original vs. transformed cell coordinats
Hi there, and thanks for this excellent question/remark!

The easy way: If you only need to "keep track" of the various areas, it would be quite an easy task for me to a) create a label for each identified area b) print out the ID of the area on the visual output images (where you've already got a number for the region ID etc) and c) list this ID in the reports. Actually, this is an excellent idea - and the whole thing could be enabled by having a single "yes/no" for ID Tracking in the options list.
The hard way: if *you* want to track the IDs (that is, by coming up with a name and assigning that to a specific area), I'm really uncertain how this would be implemented - and whether it is feasible to do at all. I therefore suggest we go for the easy way first. How does this sound?
btw: all requests/bugs can be tracked through the github issues: https://github.com/leuat/nutil/issues/14... so please use github for future communication.

Nicolaas

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Boaz Mohar Jul 5, 2020
RE: Getting original vs. transformed cell coordinats
Sharon Christine Yates Aug 21, 2020
Sharon Christine Yates Aug 21, 2020