help
help > Ann Arbor (Monk, C.S./Seidler, R.D./Peltier)
Mar 6, 2012 08:03 PM | Igor M
Ann Arbor (Monk, C.S./Seidler, R.D./Peltier)
Hello all,
The Ann Arbor (a) dataset has the following description:
AnnArbor_a.tar (n = 25 [22M/3F]; ages: 13-40; TR = 1; # slices = 40; # timepoints = 295
I was wondering if there is a typo in the TR (1 second). This seems to be an unusually fast acquistion.
I located the following paper by Monk et al, and was wondering if the dataset is based on it:
The paper says that a TR of 2 seconds was used (also 40 slices, ~300 time points).
The (b) dataset is also listed as having a 1s TR.
Thanks.
IM
The Ann Arbor (a) dataset has the following description:
AnnArbor_a.tar (n = 25 [22M/3F]; ages: 13-40; TR = 1; # slices = 40; # timepoints = 295
I was wondering if there is a typo in the TR (1 second). This seems to be an unusually fast acquistion.
I located the following paper by Monk et al, and was wondering if the dataset is based on it:
Monk, C.S., Peltier, S.J., Wiggins, J.L., Weng,
S.-J., Carrasco, M., Risi, S., Lord, C.
Abnormalities of intrinsic functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders,
(2009) NeuroImage, 47 (2), pp. 764-772.
Abnormalities of intrinsic functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders,
(2009) NeuroImage, 47 (2), pp. 764-772.
The paper says that a TR of 2 seconds was used (also 40 slices, ~300 time points).
The (b) dataset is also listed as having a 1s TR.
Thanks.
IM
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Igor M | Mar 6, 2012 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Mar 8, 2012 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Apr 13, 2012 | |