open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Result of the 2010 PNAS paper
Apr 17, 2012 05:04 PM | Fang-Cheng Yeh
RE: Result of the 2010 PNAS paper
Hi Maarten,
I checked the files in detail using the information you gave; however, there is no male > female data in the provided files. For example, 24si_1093su_age_gender_Fox_tn_PCC_3mm_sex.nii.gz only contain value 2, indicating female > male. I also compared the file with the PNAS paper and confirmed that there is no male > female regions.
Could you please check it again? Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Frank
I checked the files in detail using the information you gave; however, there is no male > female data in the provided files. For example, 24si_1093su_age_gender_Fox_tn_PCC_3mm_sex.nii.gz only contain value 2, indicating female > male. I also compared the file with the PNAS paper and confirmed that there is no male > female regions.
Could you please check it again? Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Frank
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 3, 2012 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Apr 3, 2012 | |
| Jonathan Ipser | Nov 18, 2013 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Nov 18, 2013 | |
| Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 4, 2012 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Apr 5, 2012 | |
| Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 17, 2012 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Apr 18, 2012 | |
| Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 18, 2012 | |
| Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 18, 2012 | |
| Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 5, 2012 | |