help > nonparametric statistics
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts
Aug 5, 2014 04:08 PM | Adham Elshahabi
nonparametric statistics
Hello Andrew and all,
Thank you very much for the toolbox. I started using it today and will use it to finalize my analysis of MEG connectivity data.
The question I have is:
The distribution of my connectivity measure is not normal. Therefore I am not sure that using T-test or F-test or any parametric statistics makes sense in my case. Is there a plugin or a quick hack to use nonparametric statistics like Kruskal-Wallis or others instead of t-test?
Thank you a lot for your great work.
Adham
Thank you very much for the toolbox. I started using it today and will use it to finalize my analysis of MEG connectivity data.
The question I have is:
The distribution of my connectivity measure is not normal. Therefore I am not sure that using T-test or F-test or any parametric statistics makes sense in my case. Is there a plugin or a quick hack to use nonparametric statistics like Kruskal-Wallis or others instead of t-test?
Thank you a lot for your great work.
Adham
Aug 8, 2014 03:08 AM | Andrew Zalesky
RE: nonparametric statistics
Hi Adham,
The NBS does not support Kruskal-Wallis. However, if you are worried about data non-normality, you could apply a power transform to your data before using the NBS. For example, use x^2 to correct for a downward skew and log(x) to correct for an upward skew. The other thing to remember is that the NBS is inherently nonparametric: the t-test and F-test in the NBS are used as a measure of variation, but not to explicitly compute a p-value. So non-normality is not as much of a concern because p-values are computed non-parametrically using permutation testing.
So I'd suggest applying a power transform if you are particularly concerned about your data not being normal, but also remember that the NBS is inherently non-parametric.
Andrew
Originally posted by Adham Elshahabi:
The NBS does not support Kruskal-Wallis. However, if you are worried about data non-normality, you could apply a power transform to your data before using the NBS. For example, use x^2 to correct for a downward skew and log(x) to correct for an upward skew. The other thing to remember is that the NBS is inherently nonparametric: the t-test and F-test in the NBS are used as a measure of variation, but not to explicitly compute a p-value. So non-normality is not as much of a concern because p-values are computed non-parametrically using permutation testing.
So I'd suggest applying a power transform if you are particularly concerned about your data not being normal, but also remember that the NBS is inherently non-parametric.
Andrew
Originally posted by Adham Elshahabi:
Hello Andrew and all,
Thank you very much for the toolbox. I started using it today and will use it to finalize my analysis of MEG connectivity data.
The question I have is:
The distribution of my connectivity measure is not normal. Therefore I am not sure that using T-test or F-test or any parametric statistics makes sense in my case. Is there a plugin or a quick hack to use nonparametric statistics like Kruskal-Wallis or others instead of t-test?
Thank you a lot for your great work.
Adham
Thank you very much for the toolbox. I started using it today and will use it to finalize my analysis of MEG connectivity data.
The question I have is:
The distribution of my connectivity measure is not normal. Therefore I am not sure that using T-test or F-test or any parametric statistics makes sense in my case. Is there a plugin or a quick hack to use nonparametric statistics like Kruskal-Wallis or others instead of t-test?
Thank you a lot for your great work.
Adham
