help > RE: Clarification on sign handling in NBS
Aug 12, 2025  01:08 AM | Andrew Zalesky
RE: Clarification on sign handling in NBS

Hi, Asli,


Absolute values are not taken. Signs are preserved. 


It should not be possible for the same edge to show increases for both positive and negative constrasts. However, it may be possible for different edges to show both increases and decreases, 


Andrew


Originally posted by ASLI AKDENIZ:



Dear Andrew,


I’m running the NBS for a two-sample t-test and have used two separate contrasts (positive and negative effects). My edge values are Fisher-z–transformed correlations. I’m consistently finding increased connectivity in the disease group, which is unexpected, and I wanted to confirm:




  1. Does NBS ever take the absolute value of edge weights internally, or is the sign preserved throughout thresholding and component formation?




  2. Are there key checkpoints you recommend to ensure the results are correct (e.g., verifying nbs.GLM.y against original data, checking matrix symmetry, and appropriate primary threshold selection)?




Thank you for your time.


Best,


Asli



 

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
ASLI AKDENIZ Aug 11, 2025
RE: Clarification on sign handling in NBS
Andrew Zalesky Aug 12, 2025