open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
May 16, 2012 10:05 PM | Torsten Rohlfing
RE: Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
You bet. The analysis and then some - editor responses and critical
analysis of these.
I would still like to have something resembling a paper to be more "citable".
And yes, Insight/Midas Journal are being considered.
PLOS One was another thought since they seem to be willing to publish negative results, but I think this isn't "primary" enough for them (they specifically do not want comments).
Originally posted by Matthew Brett:
I would still like to have something resembling a paper to be more "citable".
And yes, Insight/Midas Journal are being considered.
PLOS One was another thought since they seem to be willing to publish negative results, but I think this isn't "primary" enough for them (they specifically do not want comments).
Originally posted by Matthew Brett:
Would you consider blogging your analysis?
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
| Flavia Filimon | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 17, 2012 | |
| Christine Zakrzewski | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| juergen haenggi | May 17, 2012 | |
| Luis Ibanez | May 17, 2012 | |
| Satrajit Ghosh | May 16, 2012 | |
| Arnaud Delorme | May 17, 2012 | |
| Matthew Brett | May 16, 2012 | |
| Moriah Thomason | May 17, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
| Ged Ridgway | May 16, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Nov 4, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Nov 4, 2012 | |
| Luis Ibanez | Nov 4, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 19, 2012 | |
| Luis Ibanez | Jun 19, 2012 | |