open-discussion > RE: Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
Jun 25, 2012  11:06 PM | Torsten Rohlfing
RE: Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
... which reminds me of an experience a colleague of mine once had. When the first paper about the "Mozart effect" came out (you know, that BS that kids get higher IQ by playing them classical music when they're babies).

Anyway, my friend ran an experiment to confirm the effect and found that there isn't one. They wrote up the study and sent it to the same journal that published the original article. Their manuscript came back right away, with a note from the editor thanking him for his "amusing contribution."

Which leads me to point out that overcoming bad science is only part of what needs to be done. Overcoming ignorance and arrogance is equally important, and putting it out in the open is probably the best way to do that.

TR

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Torsten Rohlfing May 16, 2012
Flavia Filimon Jun 25, 2012
RE: Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
Torsten Rohlfing Jun 25, 2012
Torsten Rohlfing May 17, 2012
Christine Zakrzewski Jun 25, 2012
Torsten Rohlfing Jun 25, 2012
juergen haenggi May 17, 2012
Luis Ibanez May 17, 2012
Satrajit Ghosh May 16, 2012
Arnaud Delorme May 17, 2012
Matthew Brett May 16, 2012
Moriah Thomason May 17, 2012
Torsten Rohlfing May 16, 2012
Ged Ridgway May 16, 2012
Torsten Rohlfing Nov 4, 2012
Torsten Rohlfing Nov 4, 2012
Luis Ibanez Nov 4, 2012
Torsten Rohlfing May 16, 2012
Torsten Rohlfing Jun 19, 2012
Luis Ibanez Jun 19, 2012