open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
May 16, 2012 10:05 PM | Ged Ridgway
RE: Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
Perhaps BMC Research Notes
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcresnotes...
Unlike PLoS One they are happy to receive correspodence articles (I don't think they have to relate to an article published in BMC RN, though it's not totally clear from a quick glance...)
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcresnotes...
Best wishes,
Ged
Originally posted by Torsten Rohlfing:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcresnotes...
Unlike PLoS One they are happy to receive correspodence articles (I don't think they have to relate to an article published in BMC RN, though it's not totally clear from a quick glance...)
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcresnotes...
Best wishes,
Ged
Originally posted by Torsten Rohlfing:
PLOS One was another thought since they seem to
be willing to publish negative results, but I think this isn't
"primary" enough for them (they specifically do not want
comments).
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
| Flavia Filimon | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 17, 2012 | |
| Christine Zakrzewski | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 25, 2012 | |
| juergen haenggi | May 17, 2012 | |
| Luis Ibanez | May 17, 2012 | |
| Satrajit Ghosh | May 16, 2012 | |
| Arnaud Delorme | May 17, 2012 | |
| Matthew Brett | May 16, 2012 | |
| Moriah Thomason | May 17, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
| Ged Ridgway | May 16, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Nov 4, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Nov 4, 2012 | |
| Luis Ibanez | Nov 4, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
| Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 19, 2012 | |
| Luis Ibanez | Jun 19, 2012 | |