open-discussion > RE: VBM results interpretation
Jun 19, 2012  11:06 AM | Ged Ridgway
RE: VBM results interpretation
Hi Tanmay,

It's not as far outside the brain as I had initially understood. This is probably just the issue of low variance outside the brain. See e.g. Reimold's or my paper:
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16208...
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037...
And try making a tighter mask (are you using absolute/relative threshold masking or an explicit mask, or just implicit?)

Which image are you overlaying your results onto? I would recommend using ImCalc to create a mean (or median) of the spatially normalised bias corrected images, as this is probably the most representative image for your subjects.

Best,
Ged

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Tanmay Nath Jun 11, 2012
Ana Enea Nov 6, 2013
Ged Ridgway Nov 6, 2013
Ana Enea Nov 6, 2013
Ged Ridgway Nov 6, 2013
Ana Enea Nov 6, 2013
Rayana Braich Jul 18, 2012
Ged Ridgway Jun 18, 2012
Tanmay Nath Jun 19, 2012
RE: VBM results interpretation
Ged Ridgway Jun 19, 2012
Tanmay Nath Jun 19, 2012